IAM Assessment & Discovery

A two-to-six-week engagement that maps your current identity controls against PCI DSS, SOX ITGC, and SOC 2 trust criteria — and produces a remediation roadmap your steering committee can actually fund.

We start with the data you already have (Splunk, AD, ServiceNow CMDB, BigID, Wiz) so you don't have to instrument anything new just to understand your gaps.

What you get

  • Control-mapped gap analysis with auditor-friendly evidence
  • Heat-mapped risk register tied to specific applications and identities
  • Phased remediation roadmap with cost, effort, and dependency callouts
  • Executive readout deck and detailed engineering appendix
Apps Assessed
87
Controls
142
Gaps Found
38
Critical
7
Control AreaStatusRisk
Logging completenessPartialHigh
Privileged access reviewCompliantLow
Account dormancyGapCritical
Segregation of dutiesPartialMedium
Joiner-mover-leaverCompliantLow

Identity Governance (IGA)

Joiner-mover-leaver workflows, certification campaigns, and segregation-of-duties controls that are auditor-defensible — not just policy-compliant on paper.

We design around the actual humans doing reviews. If a manager can't certify 80 entitlements in five minutes, the control will fail. Our workflows are calibrated to attention spans and audit cycles.

What you get

  • JML lifecycle workflow design with role/entitlement model
  • Quarterly access certification campaigns (manager & owner)
  • SoD policy library with conflict detection and exception tracking
  • Auditor evidence packages: who, what, when, why, signature
Cert Cycles
Q1·Q2·Q3·Q4
Reviewers
214
Items
8,402
Completion
99.1%
ReviewerPopulationStatus
m.alvarez62 entitlementsComplete
j.patel104 entitlementsComplete
r.okafor48 entitlementsIn progress
k.tanaka21 entitlementsComplete
a.brown78 entitlementsOverdue
Our differentiator

IAM Logging & Monitoring

A Splunk-native practice. We onboard PCI/SOX applications, normalize to CIM, build eventtypes and tags, write enrichment lookups, and ship the dashboards that pass audit on day one.

In Splunk Cloud you don't have backend access to props/transforms — so success depends on how clean the producer side is, plus disciplined tag/eventtype hygiene. That's the work we specialize in.

What you get

  • Application-by-application IAM log standard and source-side requirements
  • Splunk Cloud onboarding: indexes, sourcetypes, eventtypes, tags
  • CIM normalization for Authentication and Change data models
  • Lookup-driven enrichment: actor → SSO ID → email → manager
  • Audit dashboards, saved searches, and HPA monitoring views
  • Cribl pipelines where data shape or volume need shaping upstream
Indexes
18
Sourcetypes
94
Eventtypes
47
CIM ✓
98.4%
EventtypeTagAppState
iam_login_successauthenticationoktaCIM ✓
iam_priv_usechangesplunkCIM ✓
iam_role_assignchangeazure-adCIM ✓
iam_secret_rotatechangevaultDrift
iam_local_logonauthenticationtaniumCIM ✓

Privileged Access & Secrets

High-Privilege Access (HPA) monitoring in Splunk, secret rotation portals built in APEX, vault-backed credential workflows, and break-glass auditing that ties activity to the actual humans behind it.

A lot of HPA programs collapse into "we have a vault, therefore we're compliant." We bridge the gap between vault telemetry and behavioral monitoring — and surface the cases where someone's still working around the system.

What you get

  • HPA telemetry catalog and Splunk dashboards (sessions, anomalies, MTTR)
  • Secrets rotation portal: scoped access, approval, attestation, evidence
  • Compliance views: rotation aging, ownership, exception management
  • Break-glass workflows with documented justification and review
HPA Sessions
3,418
Anomalies
12
Secrets
2,847
Stale
38
SecretOwnerLast RotatedState
db_prod_admindba-team14 daysOK
api_paymentsfin-eng62 daysAging
svc_etl_writerdata-platform112 daysOverdue
break_glass_rootiam-ops3 daysOK

Remediation Automation

Oracle APEX portals that turn IAM findings into closed tickets. Windows local non-admin remediation, directory compliance, segregation-of-duties workflows, and a unified Identity Control Center across all of them.

Most "remediation programs" are spreadsheets in a SharePoint folder. Ours are real applications: PL/SQL packages, role-aware UIs, ServiceNow integration, and metrics that prove the work happened.

What you get

  • Windows local non-admin remediation engine (Tanium + AD + CMDB)
  • Disposition recommendations: Keep / Disable / Vault / Remove / Investigate
  • Directory compliance & SoD review portals
  • Identity Control Center: single pane across multiple remediation portals
  • Splunk-fed metrics: backlog burn-down, SLA, owner velocity
Open
147
Auto-actionable
82%
Closed (30d)
2,914
SLA
96%
AccountHostDispositionConfidence
svc_backup_l1WIN-DB-014VaultHigh
tmpadminWIN-FIN-203RemoveHigh
vendor_smithWIN-PRD-091InvestigateMed
local_helpdeskWIN-HR-440DisableHigh
dba_oldWIN-DB-003RemoveHigh
New

AI-Augmented IAM

LLMs and ML applied where they earn their keep — account dispositioning, anomaly classification on Splunk events, natural-language audit Q&A, and copilots that turn 40-hour reviews into 4-hour ones.

We're skeptical of "AI for everything." The wins in IAM are narrow but real: classifying the long tail of accounts, summarizing certification populations, and giving auditors a chat surface over data they'd otherwise wait two weeks for.

What you get

  • Disposition copilot — recommends actions with reasoning trace
  • Splunk anomaly summarizer — turns 200 events into a 5-bullet incident brief
  • Audit Q&A bot — natural-language interface over your evidence corpus
  • Cert-cycle accelerator — clusters entitlements, surfaces outliers
  • Guardrails: source-grounded answers, no autonomous action without human review
Reviews / hr
142
Auto-classified
78%
Cited sources
100%
Hours saved
40+
▸ ask: "why is svc_backup_l1 flagged?"
Account is local on WIN-DB-014, last logon 8 days ago, member of unexpected group "Local Admins" not present in policy. Confidence: High. Recommended: Vault (justification: matches service-account pattern, high logon frequency).
Engagement

Not sure where to start?

Most engagements begin with a two-week assessment. We'll come back with a one-page plan, a defensible scope, and the names of the artifacts you'll have on day 90.